MIT Sloan Website




STORE
Search   
 
Store Home View Cart Check Out Contact Us Help/FAQs

Back Issues
Business Ethics and Public Policy
Corporate Strategy
Collections
Financial Management
For Faculty and Schools
Global Business
Human Resources
Information Systems
Leadership
Managerial Economics
Marketing
Operations
Service and Quality
Sustainability
Technology and Innovation
Are U.S. Managers Superstitious about Market Share?
By Cathy Anterasian, John L. Graham and R. Bruce Money
Summer 1996
Reprint 3745
Volume 37, Number 4, pages 67-77, 11 pages
Primary Topic: Marketing

Summary

Does the strategy of linking market share to profits really work? This investigation argues that there is simply no causal relationship between market share and profits. In highly volatile industries, market-share-based strategies can be misleading. The authors provide evidence from two studies, one using the FTC Line of Business data and the other employing data on the performance of sixty-three companies in three countries. In the first case, companies that maintained stable operations were more profitable than those that maintained stable market shares. In the latter, Japanese companies in a wide variety of industries had more stable operations than comparable U.S. firms.

OR

Includes one pdf to copy from.
Pricing is based on # of
copies made.

Info on pricing and academic discounts.


 
 
Copyright © Massachusetts Institute of Technology
1977-2009. All rights reserved.
877-727-7170, mitsmr@pubservice.com