MIT Sloan Website




STORE
Search   
 
Home View Cart Check Out Contact Us Help/FAQs

Business Ethics and Public Policy
Corporate Strategy
Financial Management
Human Resources
Global Business
Leadership
Information Systems
Technology and Innovation
Managerial Economics
Marketing
Operations
Service and Quality
Miscellaneous
Back Issues
Sustainability
Collections
Should You Build Strategy Like You Build Software?
By Keith R. McFarland
Spring 2008
Reprint 49315
Volume 49, Number 3, pages 69-74, 6 pages
Primary Topic: Corporate Strategy
Secondary Topic: Leadership

Related Articles

Summary

Strategy is a mechanism through which a company makes sense of the world around it. It is a collection of ideas about how the company intends to win, the source code upon which everything else depends. Because strategy can only capture a company's best thinking at a given point in time, the author argues that strategy, much like a software program, needs to be updated and refined as people gain new experience and knowledge. With traditional approaches to strategy development, the author argues, planning is optimized for the original targets; it is difficult to change directions once implementation is under way. Adaptive processes, by contrast, help companies create and adapt strategy quickly and iteratively, so that people can effectively triage issues and allocate resources in changing environments; they are optimized to identify the best ideas and to ensure that individuals throughout the organization have access to the latest version so that everyday actions can be aligned with the most important strategic insights. Since people throughout the organization play roles in the company's strategic success, strategy development needs to tap into ideas from everywhere. This requires opening up the process to people throughout the organization, permitting extensive face-to-face collaboration, and arranging for individuals other than senior executives to facilitate important strategic discussions. Drawing extensive comparisons with software development and using examples from companies including Metrowerks and Shamrock Foods Co., the author focuses on three major themes: having an iterative, or "spiral," approach versus a linear approach; organizing the strategy-making process around people rather than processes; and the recognition that in strategy there is no such thing as a "silver bullet." Most managers operate in settings that are too dynamic and complex for simple success recipes. Instead of seeking long-term sustainable advantage, good managers need to create sustaining advantages on an ongoing basis.

OR

Includes one pdf to copy from.
Pricing is based on # of
copies made.

Info on pricing and academic discounts.


Related Articles

The Real Value of Strategic Planning

By Sarah Kaplan and Eric D. Beinhocker
Winter 2003
Reprint 4429



The Silent Killers of Strategy Implementation and Learning

By Michael Beer and Russell A. Eisenstat
Summer 2000
Reprint 4142



Great Strategy or Great Strategy Implementation - Two Ways of Competing in Global Markets

By William G. Egelhoff
Winter 1993
Reprint 3423



 
 
Copyright © Massachusetts Institute of Technology
1977-2009. All rights reserved.
877-727-7170, mitsmr@pubservice.com